Test and Validation


The most productive way to test something is not by making MVPs. Even before that, what you can do is reaching out to customers and ask them.

The usual way to do business is: "I'll build and they'll come".

What if you just ask first, see if there's interest (aka traction), and from there build?

You might be able to kill quickly the bad ideas.

Or look for better ideas to make it more impactful.

Just go and test. :)

Rod Aparicio

Get one tip, question, or belief-challenge that just might change the way you market, to help your customers buy. A *daily* email for b2b founders on improving your business —without the bullshit.

Read more from Rod Aparicio

Something that happens quite often when selling: you're talking to one of the right people. You might be talking with some of the people that are in the process. You might be talking (and they might love you) to one of them: technical, manager, procurement, economic buyer. While doing it, others are left. And they become your blind spot. Involve everyone who is part of the decision in your process. That'll give you better chances at moving forward, or stopping the process when things don't...

Somewhere, I read that price (or even pricing) is strategy. It's not. It CAN give you a better position or approach in a strategy, yet it's A factor for strategy (in your business). Price is advantage. It's what makes your public claim of expertise make sense —or not. It's what makes your promise give a sense of your deliverability. It's what makes your offering be good, good enough or too good to be true. It's what can be your advantage.

You've seen this everywhere. Every vendor is a (or wants to, or feels like) a strategic partner to their customers. Allow me to push back a bit on it. If that's so, what's the shared risk between them and their customers? To be a partner means that you also have skin in the game. Is a vendor really a partner?